The bad news is that violence is found at every level of our lives. The good news is that we can choose nonviolence at every level as well. But what does it mean, in specifics, to act nonviolently? The answer depends on the situation, of course, and a thousand situations might yield a thousand answers. Yet running through all of these answers we will find a single "habit of the heart": to be in the world nonviolently means learning to hold the tension of opposites, trusting that the tension itself will pull our hearts and minds open to a third way of thinking and acting.
We had the privilege of hosting Dr. Dan Siegel, who presented his remarkable work at the intersection of neuroscience and meditation. The audio clips from the talk ...
Yes, unless we act out, we balance from one foot to the other, caught in that in-between: violence vs non-violence. But to what extent is the gap, the duality, real?
This same gap is where beauty is perceived and curiosity is entertained. It is were the mystery dwells and grace radiates. A profound place to stand.
I understand what you mean, Umesh, but the context has changed dramatically. Liberation wars, including by the skillful mean of Ahimsa, are over. Today's world is composed of independant nations and today's focus is on interpersonnal as well as international cooperation. The gap between the ideal of non-violence and actual violence is as great as ever. What can change that predicament?
This only works if both sides have something to gain/not lose by moving forward. Here is a question. If the British KNEW they were going to lose India in the early to mid 1940's. Do you think they would have responded to Gandhi the way they did?
I doubt there is such a thing as a 'third way' that would miraculously resolve our conflicts. We cannot at the same time hold on to our own opinions, self image, personnal goals and hope for peace and cooperation. This is just another form of wishful thinking. The tragedy is that we go on clinging to our separate self sense while wishing for union. The sense of our self importance is bound to collide with somebody else's sense of self importance, our ego with their egos, creating havoc. So, in the end, instead of a solution comes a decision, that of the more influencial ego... and most other egos, in that business meeting, feel terribly frustrated. That's, more or less, how the system we are all contributing to, works. You have got to see the nature of that gap very, very clearly, not look for a third way but clear the way !
Standing in the gap and accepting reality for what it is, one may find oneself at peace with the way things are, with no urge to change things to the way "they might be". This is, in a way, a prescription for finding inner peace as it encourages you to stop fighting what is and to instead accept it in peace. Yet I would also add that the struggle to change things to the way they could be (better) is a worthwhile and fulfilling endeavour which in itself will help us grow and bring more joy into life.
i have been thinking ways to transform india for many years. nurturing step by step and now seen it happening. in transformed india i see a new beautiful world emerging. our light values are oneness evolutionary and joyful. way is joyful cooperation with oneness and evolving it continuously. thanks and with all love in universe.
Thank you Somik for the opportunity to respond. Parker's use of the word faithfully regarding holding the tension between reality and possibility is difficult to understand. Every day I hold this tension by realizing that I don't know. Not knowing and being open to what happens has been helpful to me.Understanding that I don't understand has also been helpful to me. Simply being in the present, rather than anticipating tension between reality and possibility is helpful even though it is difficult to do and I don't do it very often. Warm and kind regards to everyone.
?
Parker has a very interesting perspective on what I would describe as the duality of life - light versus darkness. It's not that one is necessarily better than the other. It just is. Everything is already perfect. We need both opposing forces. They each support us.
The key is exactly what he said. Find that balance. Find that fine line in between. Think of the possibilites....
Good article Somik.