The Great Divide

I appreciate the stanza that has rhythm of "One to... and one to...". Initially, the first action represents what the "left" (heart) would do, while the second embodies what the "right" (business/logic) would do. For example, actions like "to listen, to pause, to dream, to trust and flow..." align with the heart and logic. However, as the poem progresses, these roles become intermingled, blurring the lines between them. This confusion peaks in the final line of the stanza, juxtaposing "to do" versus "to be." Traditionally, doing is linked to business, and being to the heart, creating a poignant and poetic conflict with the preceding lines ; Integration feels necessary and sort of automatic; with this. This just jumped at me as i read it, so sharing :)